Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)- An Overview

Life Cycle Assessment - Overview, Benefits and Challenges_Greenesa

By Nabin Bhandari and Ram Chandra Poudel 4th December 2020

Introduction:

Rapid industrialization around the globe has escalated the environmental pollution, which has a severe impact on the environment and public health. Consequently, reducing pollution and ecological safeguard has become a prime concern of most of the cities around the world. In such a scenario, support from businesses and industries is essential for environmental protection. Each industrialist needs to assess their activities, understand how it affects the environment, and plan the eco-action to optimize their cleanliness. One crucial tool to enhance the environmental performance and support the sustainable development of businesses and industries is Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), also known as Life-Cycle Analysis. 

 

LCA is an assessment technique to measure the overall (cradle-to-grave) environmental impacts of a product, material, process, or activity (U. S. EPA, 2006). According to Curran (1996), it is a scientific tool to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of a system or product under study associated at all stages of product development

 

LCA quantifies all environmental effects caused by the inputs and outputs of a product or a process. Therefore, the analysis is based on the so-called ‘functional unit’, which may be a unit of material (e.g. a kg of steel of given composition and quality) or a unit of energy (e.g. a kW hour of electricity) (Jonker and Harmsen, 2012). LCA facilitates the decisions and policies of a product or service. 

 

LCA contributes to reducing environmental impact by redesigning the product or system that requires fewer resources and reducing the release of nonrenewable and toxic materials (Brusseau, 2019). As the tool quantifies the overall environmental and economic impact of the product, decision-makers not only know the actual resource consumption of their product and the effect of the product to the environment but also will have the opportunity to improve their product or to select the most effective method in the long run (Curran, 2016)

 

This approach, when incorporated in the early phase of the system design and manufacturing processwill allow producing environmentally friendly and sustainable goods. Thus, the application of LCA support business model and environmental policies related to sustainable consumption and production (SCP). Moreover, it helps to establish the baseline (e.g. energy and resource constraints) for specific products or processes (U. S. EPA, 2006).

 

International Standards organization (ISO) developed the LCA standards to regulate the LCA system. International standard documents ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 details the requirements and guidelines for LCA (Finkbeiner, 2014).






Components of LCA:

The LCA methodology is a standardized and staged process. In general, LCA has four components as explained below: (Brusseau, 2019; Curran, 2016; Jonker and Harmsen, 2012; SETAC1993).  


  

   I.         Goal Definition and Scoping

It is essential to conceptualize the design of the product, process, or service to obtain the most significant results.  This stage defines and describes the goal and purpose of the LCA project, including life cycle environmental impacts into the evaluation process. The goal definition and scoping include the functional unit to determine the time and resources required. Defining the functional unit determines the type of alternatives to be taken as well as facilitate the product or process design (Jonker and Harmsen, 2012; U. S. EPA, 2006)

 

This phase also creates the initial boundaries to define what to be incorporated in the specific LCA (Jonker and Harmsen, 2012). Moreover, it defines the beginning and end of the particular life cycle and draws the relationship between technical and natural system. It also defines time and location boundaries. Location boundary is essential as the environmental requirements and the consumer behaviours differ in different locations. Similarly, the time boundary is necessary to get the relevant data (Curran, 2016).

 

Goal definition and scoping is a crucial determinations stage where purpose and the insight interest define the survey framework; hence, determining the further steps. This stage may concern the intensity of the survey, required specificity, quality data, the selection of the effect parameters about the impact assessment, and the revealing possibilities within the framework of the decision-making process (Klopffer & Grahl, 2009).

 

According to ISO 14040, the scoping of LCA outlines the following vital parameters (Curran, 2016).

·      The product system and its functions

·      The functional unit

·      Technical, geographical, and temporal system boundaries 

·      Allocation methods

·      Data requirements, availability, and quality

·      Assumptions, limitations, and restrictions of the study

·      Type of critical review (if any)

·      Type and format of the report needed

 

  II.         Inventory Analysis

The inventory analysis involves quantifying all life steps of product or process, such as energy (raw materials) requirements, emissions, material flow, and environmental releases. This stage also determines the impact of inputs and outputs to the environment (Jonker and Harmsen, 2012). 

 

An inventory analysis provides data or information, which contains the generation of quantities of environmental (air, water, land) pollutants, amount of energy, and materials consumed. The remaining LCA process depends upon the quality of the data collected during the life cycle inventory (LCI).  The inventory analysis can be useful to make local or national government policy regarding environmental emissions (U. S. EPA, 2006).

 

LCI covers the following steps (Sonnemann & Vigon, 2011; U. S. EPA, 2006; DEAT, 2004):

      i.         Designing a flow diagram of the process

A flow diagram outlines the inputs and outputs of a system or process, including interrelationships using a reference case. For the flow diagram, the initial boundaries created in the goal definition and scoping stage are used as system boundaries. The more detail flow diagram provides highly significant results.

 

    ii.         Development a data collection plan

A suitable data collection plan ensures the accuracy and quality of the data. The critical elements of the data collection plan include: defining data quality, classifying data types, sources, and indicators, and preparing data collection worksheet and checklist. Also, it provides lists that specify the measurement units. 

 

The data collection plan helps to meet the expectations of decision-makers and to compare the decision made with the reference case. 

 

  iii.         Description of data collection

This phase describes the data collection and calculation techniques for each data types. It is essential to mention the time and location of collected data.  This phase involves desk review, site survey, and expert suggestions to generate the required data. 

 

Depending on the data types, data can be categorized as foreground data (data collector) and background data (data from user groups, stakeholders, records, etc.).

 

  iv.         Data analysis, evaluation and reporting results

After the completion of data input and analysis, the final report should include a thorough description of the analysis method, system boundary, assumptions, and the basis for comparison. 

 

In the report, it is crucial to explain the methodology used to analyze the data, any irregularities on data provided, and any other exceptional cases. The result of the inventory analysis is a list of quantity and quality of environmental pollutants and the amount of energy and materials used. 

 

III.         Impact Assessment

At this stage, the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) of the material and energy flow of the process or products is performed through an environmental and human health lens. Therefore, the impact assessment focusses on mitigating the ecological and social health effects and also to reduce the natural resource depletion (U. S. EPA, 2006).

 

The impact assessment includes each environmental effect that has the required data and a suitable model for description. Thus, the impact assessment supports in identifying, briefing, and quantifying the potential environmental impacts and information of the product or system (Klopffer & Grahl, 2009)

 

The inventory data showing similar impacts are transformed into particular impact categories having a standardized unit. The impact categories include sorting on a normal basis or ranking on an ordinary basis or a given hierarchy (Khoshnevisan et al., 2018).

 

The properties of a defined substance at a specific environment emit a specified polluting substance. For example, released greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and Nitrous oxide are categorized as ‘global warming potential’ substances. In general, Impact assessment includes: 

a.    Global warming potential (GWP) 

b.    (Tropospheric) photochemical ozone creation (POCP) 

c.    (Stratospheric) ozone depletion (ODP) 

d.    Land use

e.    Ecotoxicity (ETP)

f.     Eutrophication (NP) 

g.    Acidification (AP) 

h.    Human toxicity (HTP) 

i.      Radiation

j.      Thermal Pollution (Dispersion of heat)

 

These impact categories explain the potential effects of the system or output on human and environment, which differs to their spatial level, i.e. global, regional or local impacts (Jonker and Harmsen, 2012; Klopffer & Grahl, 2009)

 

After classifying the emissions to their respective environmental impact, assessment is, therefore, needed to identify the quantitative and qualitative impact of emissions. The tools like conversion factors or so-called equivalency factors are used to assess the environmental effects of the emissions(Jonker and Harmsen, 2012).

 

IV.         Interpretation

For the goal and scope defined previously, the results of the inventory analysis and impact assessment are analyzed, and the limitations are evaluated through sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. Furthermore, the conclusions are derived from the study based on which the recommendations are made. The assessment facilitates significant improvements in the design or process or product (Brusseau, 2019; Khoshnevisan et al., 2018). 

 



Applications of LCA:

Incorporating LCA at an early stage of system design will lead the businesses towards a sustainable direction, improves brand value, and provides several additional benefits. Some of the applications of LCA are shown in figure 2 above and are explained below

 

1.     Allow cost savings

As LCA assesses the product’s environmental and economic impact right from the raw material acquisition to delivery of the final product, it helps in identifying the potential upcoming operational efficiencies. Through a data-driven approach, it improves the operational efficiencies with resource use optimization, reduced power consumption, waste generation, and emissions. For example, an LCA of a DVD and Blu-ray disc manufacturing company provided them with an opportunity to reduce 13% raw material consumption, a 20% decrease in transport emission, and $40M cost savings annually(Deloitte, 2012).

 

2.    Provide suitable alternatives

LCA provides possible alternatives to different products. A decision-maker can compare the entire production system and choose the less polluting product, service, or activity. For example: When a single process is considered among two products, an object may appear more environmentally friendly than others. But, through the LCA approach, a detailed study of the whole system made which may create the opposite scenario, i.e., the product observed with less environmental impact may have more significant cradle-to-grave environmental impacts (Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC), 2006).

3.    Develop and improve product or activity

LCA helps to construct a sustainable product or design by analyzing the input (raw) materials, its processing and producing product remaining under the environmental, social, and economic criteria (Deloitte, 2012).

 

The credibility earned through disclosing the LCA-based information favours the attitude towards business and the brand. It will favourably influence the opinion and behavioural intents towards obtaining the goods (Molina-Murillo & Smith, 2009).

 

4.    Evaluate the environmental impact

LCA contributes in assessing the environmental effect of product or activity by quantifying the emissions of pollutants to water, land, and air in each life cycle stage and their possible consequences to the local or global level (Brusseau, 2019).

 

Challenges of LCA:

Holding a vital role in analyzing the sustainability of an activity or a product, the LCA may generate uncertainties which may be increasing with the impact level of the process.  This may be due to the vast quantities of measured and replicated data and the basic modelling of complex environmental cause-effect scenarios (Hellweg & Canals, 2014).

 

1.    Availability of reliable data

Sometimes the data at each stage of product development may not be available to quantify material inputs and outputs. The availability of reliable data sources may have a significant impact on the final results. There are data shortage and regional limitations of data available for most categories, which shortly includes a natural disaster, human and ecotoxicity, which will undoubtedly produce unreliable data scores and results (Hellweg & Canals, 2014; U. S. EPA, 2006).

 

2.    Incompetent LCA expertise

Mostly in developing countries, there is incompetent expertise for executing LCA studies. There has been a gap in understanding the communication between methodology and the study output not only to the project leaders but to policymakers too (Owens, 1997).


3.    Assessing environmental impacts

It is essential to define which environmental parameters, such as resource utilization, power consumption, and pollution are most concerned about and which have a more significant impact on the long run. Besides, the reliability of the environmental assessment scores depends upon the skill of the LCA professionals.

 

4.    Undertakes linearity of the impact

LCA presumes the linearity of the environmental impact, which may not be accurate in all cases. For example, LCA considers the more considerable amount of pollutants; the larger is the effect, which may depend on local conditions or critical loads (DEAT, 2004).



Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Life Cycle Analysis

Memory Quiz

References

Curran, M. A. (1996). Environmental life-cycle assessment. Int. J. LCA 1, 179.

Curran, M. A. (2016). Overview of Goal and Scope Definition in Life Cycle Assessment. Goal and Scope Definition in Life Cycle Assessment, 1–62

DEAT (2004). Life Cycle Assessment, Integrated Environmental Management, Information Series 9. Pretoria: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism.

Deloitte (2012). Enhancing the value of the life cycle. Deloitte Development LLC.

Finkbeiner, M. (2014). The International Standards as the Constitution of Life Cycle Assessment: The ISO 14040 Series and its Offspring. In Background and Future Prospects in Life Cycle Assessment (pp. 85-106). Springer, Dordrecht.

Hellweg, S., & Canals, L. M. (2014). Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science 344, 1109. doi:10.1126/science.1248361

Jonker, G., & Harmsen, J. (2012). Creating Design Solutions. Engineering for Sustainability, Elsevier, 61–81. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53846-8.00004-4 

Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S. and Tabatabaei, M. (2018) Waste Management Strategies: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Approach. In: Tabatabaei M., Ghanavati H. (eds) Biogas. Biofuel and Biorefinery Technologies, vol 6. Springer, Cham

Klopffer, W., & Grahl, B. (2009). Life cycle assessment (LCA) - A guideline for training and work. Heidelberg, Germany: Environ Sci Eur 21, 580-583.

Molina-Murillo, S., & Smith, T. M. (2009). Exploring the use and impact of LCA-based information in corporate communications. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 184-194.

Owens, J. (1997). Life Cycle Assessment – Constraints on Moving from Inventory to Impact Assessment. Jourmal of Industrial Ecology.

Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC). (2006). Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice. Cincinnati, Ohio: National Risk Management Research Laboratory.

SETAC (1993). Guidelines for Life Cycle Assessment: A code of practice. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC).

Sonnemann, G., &Vigon, B. (2011). Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases. Paris: UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Retrieved from http://lcinitiative.unep.fr

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-06/060 (U. S. EPA), 2006.Scientific applications international corporation. Life cycle assessment: principles and practice.