Genetic modification, a genetic engineering process is
simply the manipulation of the gene to alter the genetic makeup of the
organisms for the selection of desired characteristics or traits (Pyne et al.,
2011). This technology came into effect with the
development of recombinant DNA technology (Regina, 2015) which has improved the
quality of human life and the environment over the years. Whether it is the
synthesis of biochemicals or utilizing plant biomass or other organic wastes
for bioenergy and biofuel production, genetic modification has made a significant
impact on green recovery.
The increasing demand for sustainable green energy and
the negative consequences, such as global warming and energy insecurity of
fossil fuels have triggered the sustainable supply and production of plant
biomass. With the application of gene manipulation, it has become possible to
revolutionize the plant biomass yield and conversion efficiency to biofuel. Therefore,
the genetic modification technology has the potential to make a significant
impact in the global green energy transition by altering the characteristics
and properties of lignocellulosic (plant dry matter) biomass, oil, sugar, and
starch crops and transform into desired bioenergy or biofuel resources.
Biofuels are generally produced from the biomass of first-
and second-generation energy crops. The first-generation biofuel includes the most
common conventional energy, bioethanol, and biodiesel deriving from sugar
(sugar cane and sugar beet), starch (corn, wheat, and potato), and oil
(sunflower, soybean, and rapeseed). The feedstocks are associated with direct
food versus fuel competition. Hence to overcome this issue, the lignocellulosic
biomass is utilized to produce second-generation biofuel (Davidson, 2008). Most
of this biomass consists of woody, non-edible parts of plants. The agricultural
residues of rice and wheat straw, corn stover, grass plant residue, and bagasse
are the most common source of lignocellulosic biomass. This resource is already
the by-product and therefore, reduces the competition between the land for fuel
and food production.
Lignocellulosic biomass mainly consists of three main
components: cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin and pectin as a minor
component. Cellulose is a crucial polysaccharide that signals cells to grow and
connects cells to form tissues. Hemicellulose contributes to strengthening the
cell wall by interaction with cellulose. Lignin acts as a natural defense
against pathogens and provides structure to the plant. Cellulose, which is
insoluble in water, is the main component in lignocellulosic biomass.
As mentioned above, the challenge of using
lignocellulosic biomass is that the cellulose gets bonded with hemicellulose
and lignin. The fermentation process for hemicellulose becomes more complicated
than cellulose. As a result, the production of biofuel from lignocellulosic and
other plant biomass by the conventional process is expensive, not-feasible for
commercial scale, and requires advanced technology.
Therefore, the third-generation biofuel crops
including microalgae and seaweed are utilized as alternative biomass. Further, to ease the process and reduce the cost of biofuel production, gene
modification comes into play. This is known as fourth-generation biofuel crops that
involve genetically modified biomass.
In the fourth-generation biofuel production, the plant
biomass is modified genetically as desired to take high carbon contents or
other essential products that can be easily converted into biofuels. After gene
modification, the plant biomass can secrete the cellulase and hemicellulase
enzymes that can degrade the cellulose and hemicellulose. This conversion route
is called enzymatic hydrolysis. Otherwise, the biomass is treated with a complicated
thermochemical process at high temperature and pressure to disintegrate the
long-chain and complex carbon molecules.
After the disintegration, the conversion efficiency of
the downstream process can also be improved by using genetically modified
enzymes. Finally, the fermentation process followed by the distillation process
converts monomeric sugars into pure biofuel (Davidson, 2008; Fatima et al.,
2018).
The concept of genetic engineering has enormous potential in stable and high yield biomass production and conversion efficiency of biomass. The challenge for lignocellulosic biomass deconstruction becomes natural with genetic engineering by modifying lignin to reduce the biomass pre-treatment processes and conversion costs, manipulating crops to develop varieties with increased polysaccharides (C6 chains) and fewer lignin levels, and improving plant biomass to produce cellulase and hemicellulase enzymes on its own.
Gene manipulation can play a significant role to
harness improved crop yields and overcome abiotic stress to balance the food
and fuel competition. The genetic modification of crops, such as tobacco,
alfalfa, corn, and rice enhances biomass quality and yields, and the future
seems promising (Sticklen, 2008; Chen and Dixon, 2007).
Moreover, a plant with nitrogen-fixing capacity and
that which consumes less water with high biomass yields, and conversion
efficiency to biofuels is possible with genetic modification (Furtado et al.,
2014). Moreover, the non-seed plant produces oil in leaves, stems, and other
non-seed parts of plant biomass after gene manipulation. Also, the main
ingredients used in biodiesel, such as bio-based lubricants and esterified
fatty acids, can be bioengineered from oilseed crops such as Jatropha (Akashi
and Nanasato, 2018).
C4 grass (4 carbon sugar, warm-season grass),
such as napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum), sorghum (Michanthusgiganteus),
and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) and the C3 (3 carbon
sugar, cool-season grass) plant species like poplar, aspen, and willow are
considered the best source of biomass for biofuel production. Gene manipulation
of the C4 and C3 grass boost the yield of biomass. The genomic investigation in
biomass is widespread in the United States, Europe, and Brazil (Brandon and Scheller,
2020).
Biswal et al. (2015) reported that the significant
improvements in the biomass with the suppression and elimination of various
genes aids in the synthesis of specific polysaccharides. Various kinds of polysaccharide biosynthesis involve
cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin modification. Similarly, the ideal
bioenergy crop content is the result of increased cellulose biosynthesis as it
contains a C6 sugar molecule. Also, the co-overexpression of specific genes
that codes for an enzyme increase the galactose content by 80% in Arabidopsis (Brandon and Scheller,
2020). The pectin modification by overexpression of the pectate lyase gene
resulted in improved saccharification (Biswal et al., 2015).
In a nutshell, the concept of plant genetic
modification has a remarkable possibility in meeting the biofuel demand of the
world. It acts as an alternative way to mitigate the carbon footprint and proceeds
in a sustainable way to abridge the dependency on fossil fuels. Genetic
modification of plant biomass allows the significant change in gene to produce the
desired quality and volume of biomass in a short period. Numerous studies are
going on, and researchers continue to look for solutions to the global energy
crisis as plant gene recombination acts as a doable alternative.
The manipulation of plant genes converts the plant biomass to biofuel or bioenergy, and this could optimize the resources available to meet the affordable energy demand in an environment-friendly manner. With regulatory frameworks designed and participation of private and public sectors in putting plant gene modification as an agenda for biofuel, the environment can prolong and adds value in the global energy mix.
For citation: Ghimire, A. and Poudel, R. C. 2020. Genetic modification of biomass for biofuel production. Biomass Feedstock, www.greenesa.com
Genetic Modification Genetic Engineering Plant Biomass Biofuel Production Lignocellulosic biomass Biomass Cellulose Hemicellulose Lignin First-Generation Biofuel Second-Generation Biofuel third-generation biofuel fourth-generation biofuel
Memory Quiz
References
Akashi,
K. and Nanasato, Y., 2018. Recent Progress in the Genetic Engineering of
Biofuel Crops. In: Kumar A, Ogita S, Yau YY (eds). Biofuels: Greenhouse Gases
Mitigation and Global Warming. Springer, New Delhi
Biswal AK, Hao Z, Pattathil S, et
al., 2015. Downregulation
of GAUT12 in Populus Deltoides by RNA Silencing Results in Reduced
Recalcitrance, Increased Growth and Reduced Xylan and Pectin in a Woody Biofuel
Feedstock. Biotechnol Biofuels 8,41
Brandon,
A.G. and Scheller, H.V., 2020. Engineering of Bioenergy Crops: Dominant Genetic
Approaches to Improve Polysaccharide Properties and Composition in Biomass.
Front. Plant Sci. 11, 282
Chen,
F. and Dixon, R., 2007. Lignin Modification Improves Fermentable Sugar Yields
for Biofuel Production. Nat Biotechnol. 25,759-761
Davidson,
S., 2008 Sustainable Bioenergy: Genomics and Biofuels Development. Nature
Education 1(1),175
Fatma,
S., Hameed, A., Noman, M. et al., 2018. Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Sustainable
Bioenergy Source for Future. Protein Pept Lett.
25(2),148-163
Furtado, A., Lupoi, J. S., Hoang, N.
V., et al., 2014. Modifying
Plants for Biofuel and Biomaterial Production- A Review. Plant Biotechnol J 12,
1246-1258
Pyne,
M., Sukhija, K. and Chou, C. P., 2011. Genetic Engineering (2.08)- Comprehensive
Biotechnology (Second Edition). Elsevier 2, 81-91
Regina,
A. U., 2015. From Genetic Engineering to Genome Engineering: What Impact
Has It Made on Science and Society? Advances in Biology, Biofuel and Genetics
2(1),1-8
Sticklen,
M. B., 2008. Plant Genetic Engineering for Biofuel Production: Towards
Affordable Cellulosic Ethanol. Nat Rev Genet 9, 433-443